Not good enough on the dry: long braking distance and average handling.Poor results on the wet: the worst straight aqua resistance and handling, long braking distance.OverallĪccording to the test result the BF Goodrich gForce Winter took 19th place and showed one of the worst result among mid-range winter tyres. The fuel consumption difference with the leader 0.48l/100km. The external noise difference with the leader was 0.5dB. The average pulling force difference with the leader was 79 Newtons. The average lateral acceleration difference with the leader was 0.22m/s2. The snow handling average speed difference with the leader ( Continental TS 860) was 2.3km/h. The snow braking distance difference with the leader was 1.8 meters. The handling average speed difference with the best winter tyre was 1.5 meters. The braking distance difference with the best winter tyre was 2.7 meters. The lateral acceleration difference with the leader was 1.15m/s2. The float speed difference with the leader was 12.5 km/h. The wet handling time difference with the leader was 0.8 sec. The difference in average speed with the best winter tyre was 6.3km/h. The difference in braking distance with the leader was 5.2 meters. In addition, experts included into the test one reference summer tyre for comparison of results. In 2016 experts of the German publication Auto Bild have tested the BF Goodrich g Force winter at size 205/55 R16 and compared it with nineteen similar budget, mid-range and premium winter tires. 2016 Auto Bild Bfgoodrich g-Force Winter test
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |